Copyright and wronged

Gaughran Perez logged on to www. It s not like the picture was some golden chalice of Internet wonder. It s a picture of a stupid dog the Baltimore mom said. Under the banner of intellectual property record labels warn you not to bootleg their songs. Hollywood studios warn you not to download their movies. Intellectual property has lately seemed the concern of corporations trying to protect the artist from the grabby public. Dump Your Pen Friend the billboards read. Free text virgin to virgin. Alison was the chump to dump. The Chang family lawyered up. Additionally Zehl said the license had required Wong to be attributed by name which he was not. That means others can t use a photo without permission. But sometimes through fair use it actually is OK to use a photo without permission. Fair use can include scholarship or parody and is determined by a number of criteria. Further Sometimes people such as Wong can decide to give away just part of their cont! rol. For example permitting use of a photograph as long as the source is credited. They negotiated a price of for the images used plus a little more for pain and suffering Stone said. They know the business. They have to be held to a higher standard. The average Joe doesn t have a team of lawyers telling him what s legal and what s not. The story about lead paint featured a Flickr photo of Juniper playing by a paint peeling wall. When he unleashed his legalese he said staffers removed the photo. One woman said that when she complained about improper use of one of her photos the editor blamed . That is one very active intern Griffioen said. Babble immediately admits wrongdoing but said the cases were not nearly as widespread as Griffioen implied. There was a period of a few weeks where it happened as a pattern Babble publisher Rufus Griscom said. One photo assistant did not understand permissible use he said. Babble s Griscom similarly cited Flickr images as mor! e original less generic. It is the criterion by which people decide what to buy and who to buy it from. It s a byproduct of the user generated world the trustworthiness of YouTube the realness of Facebook. Above all else we believe ourselves. People don t want to buy the fake from the phony anymore Pine said. They want to buy the real from the genuine. The image is more right than the Steve Urkel an ad firm would have concocted. And the ad firms get that. Viewers can spot a professional pug model from across the living room. It all gets very meta. And none of it is comforting to the people who have had their images grabbed online. Francis Columns Justin A.

Source: http://www.journalgazette.net/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080117/FEAT/801170363
.

Another site recomended to review: buy viagra ( http://falkner-forum.org/components/com_classifieds/adimages/thu! mbs/buy-viagra.html )